User:Brews ohare/Arbitration notes

Arbitration notes

 * Arbitration motion regarding Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Speed of light


 * 20:26, 29 March 2010


 * Discuss this


 * Other editors' restrictions


 * Situation
 * Blackburne files trumped up charge
 * Sandstein enforces request by Blackburne “Consequently, per Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Speed of light#Brews ohare restricted, I am hereby banning Brews ohare indefinitely from editing the article Speed of light and its talk page.”
 * Original appeal to limit length of Sandstein's ban denied as misfiled
 * Change of venue from AI/N to Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement apparently implies different arbitrators
 * Appeal to limit Sandstein's indefinite ban Moved to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
 * Ruling based on complete sidestepping of appeal Brews ohare (talk · contribs) is topic banned from all physics-related pages, topics and discussions, broadly construed, for twelve months.
 * Discussion of inappropriate ruling
 * AN/I request to revert Headbomb's burying of pre-existing threads on Talk:Matter.
 * Headbomb takes me to ArbCom for protesting his actions on AN/I
 * All attempts to gain explanation of ArbCom action are stonewalled
 * Exchange with Ed Johnston leads to no clarification
 * Closed with a warning
 * Summary of statusmore
 * Blackburne takes me to WP:AE for posting a revision of an article he set up for AfD
 * Draconian remedy proposed in violation of all protocol
 * WGFinley admonishes me despite violation of fair-warning protocol His four-point admonition addresses misbehavior that did not occur, an outstandingly clear example of the tar baby syndrome of administration.
 * Attempt to railroad new censorship archived without clarification H in a B attempts to get clarification and several admins attempt unsuccessfully to morph this request into a lynching
 * Headbomb removes problem links to Aetherometry.com following my identification of this problem
 * Headbomb changes his mind about taking me to court over identification of Aetherometry.com links as problematical and removes my note of thanks to him for his generosity
 * Headbomb escalates matters to request a complete ban for raising the issues with Aetherometry.com
 * Timotheus Canens blocks me for my temerity, claiming reference to Aetherometry.com is a topic ban violation
 * Headbomb does it again with Timotheus Canens' support, again. Beeblebrox says no action short of a site ban is useful.
 * Comments to EdJohnston on the Headbomb charade: 1,2
 * Canens decides to seek further action No acknowledgment of my statement and my request to go beyond hearsay. A railroading of a preordained backroom decision window-dressed as a proceeding, with no attention paid to several useful and workable alternatives.