User:Brian0324/Archive 2

Christianity in China
Hi Brian,

I have seen that you have added Christianity in China recently. I think this article is too much into history, hence I consider it better, if you add to History of Christianity in China article. Kind regards, Sarcelles (talk) 10:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Sola scriptura
There's a question for your consideration at the bottom of Talk:Sola_scriptura. --Fl e x (talk/contribs) 19:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for those other changes. FWIW, I still prefer my shorter version of the "RC position" section. --Fl e x (talk/contribs) 19:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Edit war
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors.

Talking to myself?
Greetings, Brian. Check out my talk page. The IP guy vandalizing The Christianity in China page seems to be saying you and I are sockpuppets! (Although he doesn't seem to have posted it in your page). Hopefully he will be blocked soon, since he's causing quite a lot of grief over there. Anyways, thought I would say hello (although according to the anon guy, I'd be talking to myself..). :-) Cheers, and thanks for the vigilance on that page.  --Anietor (talk) 19:00, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Christianity in China
I'm not Christian and I've no intention to leave Wikipedia become a vehicle for propaganda. I know very well the issues behind Christianity in China, and I agree with the anonym. He has not deleted "sourced material", he has created a NPOV paragraph using the results of recent polls. --Esimal (talk) 19:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


 * 1. Your religious beliefs are not at issue. 2. The Christianity in China article does not reflect the highest estimates and needs correction, because the sourced statements were deleted as well as the source for Sun Yat Sen's conversion. 3. I will not edit this article until 24 hours after my last edit, but at that time I will be bringing back all of the relevant data without deleting Burklin's critique.Brian0324 (talk) 20:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree with you, Brian, that the higher estimates should be included. There are no clear numbers, and the estimates are all over the place, so it's important to include the low AND high ranges. I have tried to incorporate both...just added the higher range without removing the lower range, and I even expanded the Burklin sentence...but I suspect that it will still be vandalized/reverted. Glad there are others watching over the article to monitor and ensure neutrality. Cheers.--Anietor (talk) 23:44, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Holy cow...how you seen the ridiculous unsourced, POV nonsense that is being inserted in the article now? I wouldn't be surprised if the editor's IP address lead us to a basement bunker somewhere in party headquaters in Beijing! It's getting frustrating dealing with it, glad you're watching over the article as well. --Anietor (talk) 19:24, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Just goes to show that people who engage in personal attacks, vandalism, spamming, original research, and violation of the three revert rule in one day don't last long on Wikipedia.Brian0324 (talk) 20:46, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Piper
Could you throw in your two cents at Talk:John_Piper_(theologian) Thanks! --Fl e x (talk/contribs) 16:23, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Stop war, please
You currently appear to be engaged in ANOTHER edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xi Zhu (talk • contribs)

Criticism
I criticise you for your edits, not for your cultural background or your beliefs. --Esimal (talk) 16:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Christ Alone.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Christ Alone.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:03, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EachToHerPost.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:EachToHerPost.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JonathanGoforth.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:JonathanGoforth.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Help in copying images across Wiki, please
Dear Brian, I would like to put the image of William Tyndale you put onto his entry into the Tyndall article, which is about his family. How do I do that? Could you possibly reply on my talk page? Many thanks Francis Hoar (talk) 13:39, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for adding the portrait. I've now enlarged the section on William Tyndale and the image too - it looks great.Francis Hoar (talk)

Make a Lisu Chruch page
Brian - I think the solution is that you make a separate page on the Christan Lisu movement in China and link to it from the main Lisu page  Wwind (talk) 21:31, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Vineyard Church of Columbus Page
This page was marked for notability and redirected the same day. There was no time for notability to even be searched for. If it is redirected quickly again, vandalism will be reported. --James PL —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.170.138.34 (talk) 19:01, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Quotation in Hudson Taylor article
You've cited that the quotation "Oh, for eloquence to plead the cause of China, for a pencil dipped in fire to paint the condition of this people" is from [China's Spiritual Need and claims]. I was hoping to cite it, however, I can't find it in the source material, seen here: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/China%27s_Spiritual_Need_and_Claims Could you point me to the correct source? Thanks, parelle (a lurker rather than an editor) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Parelle (talk • contribs) 21:17, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * You raise a very good question. In the 2005 book "Christ Alone: A Pictorial Presentation of the Life and Legacy of Hudson Taylor", the back section has a collection of quotes and this one is attributed to Taylor from China, Its Spiritual Need and Claims. However, as I have read both the original edition (1865) and an update from 1883 or so (which is in Wikisource) I was not able to find the quote, either. I did ask James H. Taylor III about this quote once before, but after reading the 1865 edition copy and still not finding it, I may ask him again if he knows why it was stated as such in the 2005 book. So, yes, it is possibly from some other place, originally. I don't doubt that Taylor said it, but I think that it is possibly misplaced in the 2005 work. Hope this helps.Brian0324 (talk) 21:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Vineyard Church Notability Concerns
Good afternoon, I noticed you tagged the Vineyard Church of Columbus with a notability tag. I have been previously concerned about the notability of this article as well as that of Rich Nathan, but my AfD on that subject didn't get very far. Unfortunately, what you'll find is a number of members of the church who are quite sure that their church is notable enough despite its brief history and general lack of mention in third party sources. If you encounter these kinds of complaints regarding the notability, please let me know so I can back you up. Thanks.--Analogue Kid (talk) 22:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AFlameofSacredLove.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AFlameofSacredLove.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Book-Hudson-Taylor-Volume-1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Book-Hudson-Taylor-Volume-1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Book-Hudson-Taylor-Volume-2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Book-Hudson-Taylor-Volume-2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HudsonTaylorSpiritualSecret.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:HudsonTaylorSpiritualSecret.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Lisu people
Brian - I have reviewed the changes you have made on the Lisu page and the seperation of the Animistic and Christain section does settle my views somewhat. I am not sure that I agree with including Fraser and the Mission in the page or not, but I think that it deserves a rest right now and will leave it as both of us can take time to consider and see if others have opinion.

the one small change I did make is changed regarding fraser that instead of 'influenced thousands of lisu'  i changed this to 'worked with lisu'  I hope this change is acceptable and you can understand my reasons for the change. Let us revisit this discussion at a later date after reflection by both parties. Wwind (talk) 15:15, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NotLessThan.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:NotLessThan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Isobel Kuhn
If I'm not responding to your comments on the most convenient page, please tell me what that page would be and how to get there.

First, I have to say that I've done some writing in my time, and I'm familiar with American newspaper-style writing. So, I have a good basis for understanding how to correctly write a printable article. So, even though the "Wiki" writing style may be different from other styles, it can't be that different. While the Associated Press Style Book may not be the standard everywhere, it is the template of style for newspapers across America. It's also the style that I know.

Beyond that, I just don't think you understand where I'm coming from, at all. The only thing that I thought you were nit-picky about was your number four. I do understand that the Christian worldview isn't easily understood by non-Christians. Christians speak a lot of Christian slang in their worldview. But all people, everywhere, for all time, Christian or not, "....have eternity in their hearts (Don Richardson)," so that everyone, everywhere, can understand that the people on sphere called, "earth," are living in a world made-up of secular and sacred things, even if certain people don't believe in sacred things or if certain people can't correctly indentify between secular and sacred things. But, I've seen many non-Christians correctly identify that the world is comprised of a secular and sacred worldview in this life, in my 50-plus years on this earth, so that my thought is that this is basic common knowledge.

Also, have you even read any of the books written about Isobel Kuhn's life that can comprise the "Wiki" story about her, especially, "By Searching: My Journey Through Doubt Into Faith" and "In The Arena," considered part one and part two, respectively, of her autobiography? You don't impress me as one who has read any of the books on Kuhn, as noted in her biography. Please, let me challege you to not write to me anymore if you haven't read at least part one of Kuhn's autobiography.

Lastly, I don't think I own "Wiki's" "Isobel Kuhn" article or any of the articles that I've added content to or edited. And, I have taken writing classes in college where my class work has been critiqued with solid integrity. So, I don't think I'm as thin-skinned in that respect anymore. I just bristle though when someone who doesn't seem to know what he or she's talking about tells me that I don't know what I'm doing in a writing genre, when it clearly looks to me like that person hasn't a clue what I'm doing.

I do though apologize for the process being so drawn out on the "Isobel Kuhn" page.

Canihaveacookie —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.92.164.151 (talk) 19:21, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I have read her writing. Not every book. Actually it might frighten you but I've authored dozens of Wikipedia pages about missionaries that I've read only a minimal amount of - Don Richardson, for example.Brian0324 (talk) 21:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Isobel Kuhn.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Isobel Kuhn.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Regarding Nee and your understanding
Hi Brian,

I highly appreciate your contribution to the wiki articles on protestantism and great people of God like Br. Taylors and others. You are in MN and I am in ND, so I think that the distances dosn't matter to verify things and to understand the POVs (things of China and Christianity). I read your comment on the Nee's talk page, and I felt communicating with you.

1. I have studies Mr Nee for more than 4 years now (almost 50 of his books) and articles. I would request you to read his testimony -- Watchman Nee's testimony. It has a lot of facts, information and truths about his life and living (all depending upon one's faith that whether these are really facts, neutral information, and truths or not). 2. You seem to be so much knowledgeable about Chinese mission fields and missionaries of past to china and overall the idea of protestantism but I see that you, yourself have a strong POV about the Nee. 3. In China, the largest (both seen or underground) fellowship of churches are of local churches -- I don't have data on how many but all I can say that local churches are growing very intensely in Mainland, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and other south asian countries. People there are not like "American minded about cults and new religions" (I myself am an India and have seen enough religion in India and know how to expose a cult and to beware of it). 4. The local church is not a cult, neither Mr Nee or Lee was heretic, cultic in reagrds to their teaching and ministry. This is a information age but also a global and plane age. You have tons of information on Nee and local churches but I am pretty sure that if you travel also to these churches and to walk enough to see what they really are and speak and think of God, christianity, you, and the unsaved -- I am sure that your view will become neutral. 5. We all are have POVs, but some POVs are right and factual and some are based on just informations and emotions. 6. Oh that we see that we may see it. And it is this division about which Nee/Lee/others were talking that even after knowing that we are saved and christinas and one in eternity and heaven --our communication seems not to be a brotherly fellowship but rather a secular talk. 7. I trust that you will be honest in findings truths about Nee and particularity about (local church) (not just by reading/collecting information of information age) but by stepping forward in love, truth, spirit, and God's way before assuming that some people are making Nee a "hero" and not "Christ". 8. We all have POVs. Is the Neutral point of view (in matters of God and divine) compromising? Are we compromised? Are we secualr? I am not? Neither I am a member of any cult nor do I consider myself a religionist (or christian). I have only Christ and HIS word, the Bible, which I hold with all my strenght. Thanks. HopeChrist (talk) 19:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi Brian, Thanks for your valuable note and response. I agree to most of the things you wrote on my talk page. You don't know how much helpful your responses are to me. From your note on "The Economy of God" to notes on POVs on Mr. Nee's article, all are so helpful and informative for me to understand how Wikipedia article's are written and it should be (on spiritual/religious subjects). (I am relatively new to wiki, english, and POVs issues)

However I am still not sure by what you exactly wish or want on Nee's article on wiki:


 * Many of the things you deleted from Mr. Nee's article were not added/written by me. Nor do I have all the citations for the things quoted. However, as soon as possible, I will try to cite quotes for the things I have written or added.
 * Unfortunately, from my search on Mr. Nee, not many third party quality and trustworthy resources are available on internet and press articles on him and his life and ministry other than the books he has written and talks he gave during his life. I believe, published books (of him and about him) from LSM or any other publisher should be considered as neutral, valuable, and trustworthy resource (for citations and quotes). Thanks a lot. HopeChrist (talk) 02:32, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Work group
Do you think there would be support for a Christianity in China work group - like the one for Indian Christianity? The Indian project has really helped connect editors and we have gotten two GAs promoted since we began. If you really want to improve the portal, a project or work group is almost a must! I can help with design, you would have to get an idea of how many people would join. We don't need many - 5 or six would be a great start. Let me know what you think. I am doing some final tweaks on the Indain Christianity portal and then will pitch in on the Christianity in China portal. Best wishes, -- Secisek (talk) 02:55, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes Brian, We can help if you want Christianity in China work group for WP Christianity - Tinucherian (talk) 08:09, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

India
The project is really Tinucherian's baby. I have just been helping him out, as I now plan do for you at China. Once he gives his opinions, I think we can procede - if there is consensus. You must know that minutia like names and graphics do not effect me one way or the other. That is not why I edit here and what ever is fine with me. -- Secisek (talk) 21:44, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * A new graphic almost exactly like yours was settled on by consensus. Work on the name debate is going on now. This seems to be going well! Can Portal:Christianity in Africa be far behind? From a passing chat a few months ago to this: India and China portals up and running! --Secisek (talk) 07:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Christianity barnstar
-This award is for User:Brian0324 for his Excellent efforts and hardwork for the articles related to Christianity in China and Portal:Christianity in China --- Tinucherian (talk) 08:49, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Christianity in China
To be honest, I find the subject a little tedious and not my field of expertise or interest. The cross-cultural West-East information is somewhat fascinating, but theology and the documenting of the spread of certain ideologies really isn't my specialty. Although philosophy and the history of philosophy sparks an interest in me, I find material history, economic history, political history, military history, technological and scientific history, and social history to be much more exciting and fun to learn about. I found it hard to get even past the introduction of this Christianity in China article; maybe if there was more in depth description of the missions and the attitudes of missionaries and Chinese, then I would find the article to be of interest. Right now, I think I'm going to shift focus from Chinese history to American political and warfare history anyways. So, good luck with this article, if it's something that you've got a vested interest in editing (as evidenced by your barnstar here). Cheers.-- Pericles of Athens  Talk 22:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject_Council/Proposals
Add your name here ... - Tinucherian (talk) 02:19, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Changes to Indian Christianity Wikiproject/workgroup
Upon discussion and consensus ( see here) , The following changes and decisions were taken w.r.t to Indian Christianity workgroup :-
 * The scope of workgroup will be limited to Indian region only for now.
 * The workgroup will be renamed to Christianity in India instead of Indian Christianity.
 * The changes will effect the project pages, Portal and the templates.
 * The templetes will be replaced by a Indian map instead of Tricolor flag picture.

This is FYI - Tinucherian (talk) 04:44, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Portal:Christianity in China/Intro
I got back to you on the talk page there. ʄ! •¿talk?  05:38, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia (Evidence:). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --Angelo De La Paz (talk) 17:05, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


 * This edit may be disputed but is certainly not vandalism. Assume good faith. -- Secisek (talk) 18:05, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I remove incoherent and mis-spelled statements when I find them and this was a doozy.Brian0324 (talk) 18:10, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

James Janeway
My name is Hilaire, and I am a student at Simon Fraser University in British Columbia, Canada. I am writing a graduate paper on James Janeway, and would like to know where and how you found the biographical information on Janeway, as it is more than I have found.

Feel free to contact me at hcf1@sfu.ca

18:41, 11 April 2008 (UTC)~

What you wanted
WikiProject Christianity in China/Introduction -- Secisek (talk) 22:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Chinese rite controversy
I added some text, hopefully it gives the article a nice ending. I de-ephasized the Congregation, in part, because she did not act on her own, in part, because there are conflicting sources, as to which papal congregation issued the papal decree. --Ambrosius007 (talk) 09:15, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Isobel Kuhn
I haven't looked at the "Isobel Kuhn Discussion Page" for a long time now. However, I looked at it today. What you wrote concerning, "Isobel Kuhn," was amazing, because it was very analytical and made a lot of sense. Yet, how you worked that sense out on Isobel Kuhn's bio page left me scratching my head. I really do understand that none of us who creates/edits Wiki pages owns the page. I've also communicated that to others. However, in my brief time on Wikipedia I've noticed a real arrogance by some people who will let nobody else make the smallest changes to pages they have an interest in; and, they just stiff-arm others from contributing anything, even if it's good grammar. Though, I don't perceive you to be like that.

Now, while you may have been the one to


 * Um, not sure if you were finished with your thought. Actually, I'm not sure what you are getting at, yet. I'll let you finish before I respond.Brian0324 (talk) 13:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Religion in China
Hi guy!

I am appreciate your Chinese Christian related articles and that's really useful. But I want to remind you that you shouldn't bring the whole article of "Christianity in China" into the main article of Religion in China because "Christianity in China" has got some problems (especially NPOV). And because if you do that again so as I can see that you are making people think that Christianity is the most important religion and the best religion in China although it's only a minority religion here, although it's growing in mainland China but it's also declining among the Chinese communities in Taiwan, Macau, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Sorry to say that but Christianity is not the favorite religion of mostly Chinese people who always respect the traditional culture, native religions and especially our ancestors. I think you are a nice guy but I hope you are listening to me. Thank you so much. God bless you and your family the best.Angelo De La Paz (talk) 20:16, 5 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I do listen. I'm not sure what to do with your commentary about Religion in China. The Talk:Christianity in China page is available if you think that it is still POV. It wouldn't be unreasonable if the Christianity section in the Religion in China article was longer. But I did scale it back - as long as it mirrors the parent subject article it think that it is fairly represented.Brian0324 (talk) 21:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Taylor_Children.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Taylor_Children.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 18:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Add to the Beauty.jpg}
Thank you for uploading Image:Add to the Beauty.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:ChinasMillions.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ChinasMillions.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --22:43, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Image:Conversations Groves.jpg)
You've uploaded Image:Image:Conversations Groves.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions.

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:All Right Here.jpg}
Thank you for uploading Image:All Right Here.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:All Right Here.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:All Right Here.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:17, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Past the Wishing.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Past the Wishing.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:20, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The Other Side of Something.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:The Other Side of Something.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:20, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Station Wagon Sara Groves.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Station Wagon Sara Groves.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:20, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tell Me What You Know.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Tell Me What You Know.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

The Great Tea Race of 1866
Hi, could you please look on the issues mentioned on the discussion? --Matthiasb (talk) 10:04, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Christianity WikiProject Newsletter - July 2008
This Newsletter was automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 09:05, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Anglo_Chinese_College.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Anglo_Chinese_College.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:35, 17 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 19:35, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Carstairs Douglas
Hi Brian - as a prolific editor of articles concerning Christianity in China, I thought you might be interested in an article I started on Carstairs Douglas, a 19th-century Scottish Presbyterian missionary. Taffy (talk) 18:18, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Sally Kern
Greetings. As a fellow Christian, may I ask you for examination of an article about Oklahoma Republican Representative Sally Kern? She is currently an object of continuing smear campaign for her critical statements about homosexuality she made few months ago. Is a biblical stance towards homosexuality a sign of "homophobia" or not? Currently one of the administrators have taken side on the issue, which I believe is unfair and biased. Could you take a look at the discussion on the article talk page? Regards. Ammon86 (talk) 18:19, 9 August 2008 (UTC)