User:BrianE22/User:Ianmdonnelly/sandbox/BrianE22 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Ianmdonnelly
 * User:Ianmdonnelly/Jack of Diamonds (artists)

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes a piece of the lead was updated with the information he added in the body.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No, missing a summary of "Membership Growth"
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, adds information that assists in understanding the topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I don't think so, additions are quite concise and neutral

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Yes, but only in the areas he did not update yet.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, it keeps a neutral tone throughout.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, it is a very new source from 2011, seems updated and worthy.
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, more information should be added, for a draft this is overall concise and well written.

Organization evaluation: It is organized in a concise manner with no grammatical errors, the major points added are helpful in understanding the topic, more information neeeded.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

==== Overall evaluation: Overall I believe the additions are well thought out and needed for the article, it helps summarize what it is the reader is trying to read and understand. Overall I believe it is very good. ====