User:BrianSeo1/sandbox

Posttraumatic stress disorder
Everything on the page appears to be relevant and belongs on the page.

Glancing through, it's difficult to tell if any biases are present. A lot of the information presented appears factual, so it is difficult to make judgments. The prevention and treatment section does not appear to hold the same neutrality as the rest of the article.

There are a few citations that are still needed in the article. Most of these come from therapy available for PTSD. The links and citations I examined also worked properly.

A few sources are marked as unreliable.

A lot of information presented references the DSM-IV and should probably be updated with the DSM-V. I also don't see any mention of the CAPS. I was under the impression that the CAPS 4 was the gold standard for PTSD assessment under the DSM-IV. I know the CAPS 5 is currently going through factor analysis to match the DSM-V.

The management section needs to be overhauled in my opinion.

October 3rd, I adjusted some wording of symptom clusters on PTSD page. I linked to the CAPS page and mentioned the CAPS as a widely used assessment in PTSD.

Talk Page
There appears to be minimal talk on the page. Some people have gone through and examined citations.

Some minor talk regarding the image used.

The article talk page is extremely different from how we talk about it in class.

I might put something in talk about updating for DSM-V and asking about the CAPS.

I put something in talk regarding Diagnosis and assessment.