User:Briannamac/Kid influencer/Ajkendall100559 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Kid influencer


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Kid influencer


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

Amazing lead, well defined and properly explained with examples.

Content

Great background on the origins of this type of influencer and how it is shaping up to be now. Could use some more detail on how this is now seeing an exponential growth in changes. And another interesting angle could be an international perspective of child stars/influencers.

Tone and Balance

Overall very consistent, however in some portions there is a bit more leeway in the type of language being used and begins to sound a bit more opinionated.

Sources and References

For the amount of content being given in this article, there aren't too many references being listed. I would be careful of this and try to find some additional information to back up what is already being said, as well as supporting your own additions with a few more sources than just one.

Organization

Well organized, but seeing some things shifted around a bit more might be helpful. Notable Kid Influencers feels a bit out of place and could be moved elsewhere.

Images and Media

Only one image, but lots of additional details and examples. With more examples gives more opportunities to add images/media. I would take advantage of it.

Overall Impressions

Very promising starter article with lots of potential and plenty of things that could be still be said. With a little bit of editing, readjusting, and supporting details, I think this will make a fine article.