User:Bribrisweet/22Kill/AAnonymous Bear Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * 22Kill movement, done by my peer in class:  Bribrisweet
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: 22Kill

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
The lead does provide content as to what the movement is, however it is very brief and doesn't give a lot of details. Such as "it is composed of multiple programs," the page should elaborate on the specific programs. The lead does give relevant information, but it's so brief that the reader needs to go to other websites to get more information on the movement.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
This page has no content table due to the limiting amount of content on the topic. This page just states what the movement is and a sentence of the history of the movement. There is a lot of room for improvement on this page, the page can provide content of statistical evidence that leads to the movement.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
The tone of the page is balanced and doesn't feel that the page is trying to persuade the reader. Overall the viewpoints are underrepresented and does not provide much information.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
The organization of the page is dull, due to the fact that there's not much on the page. The page is not concise and doesn't go into detail on important topics, such as the usage of social media and celebrities that helped the movement.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
The article does not include any image making the page dull and if they were added the topic could enhance people's understanding of the moment.