User:Bridgetkat/Animal rights in Jainism, Hinduism, and Buddhism/Jackielupinblack Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

A far from reading I admire how process of the article is turning out. This article choice is really engaging in terms of expanding more information about these three religions and their views on specific animals rights. The article is quite short, but from my information I'm assuming you tend to summarize the main points, but still cite/reference the main and larger article. You did a great job in choosing/using both secondary and primary sources to gather your information instead on relying one over the other. I'm not sure if you have added your information to the article yet, but from reading it's well balance in keeping a neutral tone and summarizing the resources, being straightforward yet very informative. I recommend expanding more information on Jainism especially their establishment of animal hospital, perhaps using your article "Jain traditions" and "Jainism." I'm impress with the article choice "Hinduism and the Ethical Treatment of Animals," this will greatly add on to the incomplete Hindu section. I'm looking forward your information to be added on to the article. - Jackielupinblack

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) : Bridgetkat
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Bridgetkat/Animal rights in Jainism, Hinduism, and Buddhism

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?