User:BrightBuds/Clonally transmissible cancer/Bridgettemora Peer Review

General info
(provide username) User:BrightBuds/Clonally transmissible cancer
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Sandbox Draft
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Article

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The article starts different than most, while most start with a lead, they start with whom the diseases affect. They quickly begin to talk about cases and what is happening however I believe it would be more effective to start with that rather than humans. They do a great job of integrating other sources however do not have references listed. Overall, the tone is educational, with the exception of a couple things this isa good article, I would just go back and add references and maybe make your second paragraph the first.