User:Brit587/sandbox

THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH IS FOR Wikipedia--Draft your article Due May 02, 2018 FOR

Region: global   Broad topic: air quality  Stub article: Particulate pollution. <- Needs to add more Tonylopez3 (talk) 19:30, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Tonylopez3

Evaluate Wikipedia Article Assignment 04/21/18

Article Title: Complete Streets

Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_streets 

·        '''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you'''

- Yes, but the Section on “Providing Vehicular Cyclists with Routine Accommodation in the U.S. as Park of Complete street is distracting because it seems like a slight tangent of Complete Streets topic.

·        '''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?'''

- Yes, all information presented is factual base with not biases views.

·        Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

- Underrepresented viewpoints would be in regards to Bicycle and Public transit accommodation.

·        '''Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?'''

- Yes, the link works. Yes, the citation link supports the claim made in the article regarding safety to all how use complete streets.

·        '''Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?'''

- Each fact is referenced with an appropriate and reliable reference. However, some of the reference do make factual statements they do so to forward their agenda, policy or study of their own bias.

·        '''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?'''

- Yes, some information is out of date that is from 1999, but it is ok because it is used a how things have transition through the years and showing the progress that had led to complete streets. Perhaps, more examples of complete street in more diverse urban setting would be beneficial to this article.

·        '''Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?'''

- On the Talk page subjects being addressed is for one the plurality of the article that is question. That a single street can be complete not necessary more than one to qualify as a complete street concept. There are also improvement suggestions made on its comprehensiveness, and after a given compliment the option of some parts of the article are to shorts. Which I saw evident in my comment about the section that seemed distracting.

·        '''How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?'''

- The talk page states that the article is yet to receive a rating “on the project’s importance scale”..

·        How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

- The article presents the topic of complete streets as their benefits and design elements where as in class we already know these thing to the topic and so our discussion goes further to deciding were complete streets could be benfical or not; as the political process to approves complete streets construction.

·        '''OPTIONAL: Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes'''

(Below is for the Wikipedia --add to a wikepedia article in Wikipedia-CITED)

'''Chapter 1. The Mayor of Happy'''

The major, Enrique Penalosa, takes a stroll though his city and encounters many of his constituents. With whom he shares intriguing conversation with regarding the city itself. The overall consensus of the conversation is that if our needs are met we can all live happy lives, but if the urban design fabric of city conflicts with our needs it can impede on our happiness.