User:Britneymendoza/sandbox

work cited for the psychiartic nurse
== American Psychiartic Nurses Assoication   == Article 1: "Physician Assistant" Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physician_assistant The length of the article is good amount It Stays within the topic it does not bounce to different topics. The background information is good, explains the term "Physician Assistant" in a sufficient way for readers to understand and get a better understanding of the career and the deatils of it. There are some soruces that need ctations to be verfied to make it better. Also, there's some that rely on the references than the overall topic itself. But overall the some sources are reliable. The Article is not biased in anyway. The Article also talks about the "MCAT" and other tests that are important to the career and the sources that talks about those are reliable. There no viewpoints that are overrated everything is strictly about the topic and the main history that came with it. Some Citations worked but had some fixing that needed to fixed immeditley. No information was out of date. There was no information missing. The talk: The talk page mention about medical sources that needed to be visited on the Project page for details or questions. The rating: The article was a B-Class on the project quality scale and its been rated as "Low-Importance" on the projects importance scale.

Article 2: "Disneyland" Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disneyland The length of article is good amount explains a lot of the details about the park but also the history of the making of the park. Everything is dated accept the photos they have of the park. The the topic that talks about the "Lands" the whole sections needs additional citations that need to be verified, which will help improve the article. The operations section the "Theatrical terminology" does not cite any sources which will not help the article because how would we know if the facts they are saying is true or false without any sources it will not help the Article. The sources are reliable, theres some that need to be edited which will help the article. The links that give work there's no plagiarism in the article. The "Back Stage" section includes lists of references related to the topic but the sources are unclear because its lacking inline citations. Which will prove introducing the section. The Talk: There was no discussions about improvements.. The Rating: Rated B Class, High Importance on Wiki Project, B Class, High Importance on Wiki Project Amusement