User:BrittanyU/Pomacea bridgesii/Peytonw27 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:BrittanyU/Pomacea bridgesii/


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BrittanyU/Pomacea_bridgesii?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
I like how you added extra information on how the snails are introduced into the habitat. The information on how it also impacts fertilization and through production along with the accessibility to where the snails have impacted. In the anatomy section adding the physical features and how the shell is beneficial to the mystery snail is a good way to improve the quality of the article because it adds extra information that the original author left out. It also adds clarification to the paragraph. The sources within the Wikipedia page look good when I looked over them and clicked on the them to go look at the article. When I looked at your references I noticed they were not in alphabetical order, I have tended to do this and would look over to make sure it's not required for a Wikipedia page.