User:BrittanyU/Pomacea bridgesii/Tomslocumb1 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

BrittanyU


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BrittanyU/Pomacea_bridgesii?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Pomacea bridgesii
 * Pomacea bridgesii

Evaluate the drafted changes
The information that is included thus far makes a good and valid addition to the information that is already in the article, and nothing seems to be cited incorrectly in the references format. However, none of the in article citations are done or linked correctly. Each place the the full MLA format follows a cited phrase should be cited with a numerical footnote using the "Cite" option at the top of the editing document; this will pair each cited phrase with the ordered citation in the references. Other than this formatting issue, the only edits I felt necessary to make were to include additional information that would steer the page to be more relevant to the zoological information we are learning in class/expand upon details that were mentioned but not delved into. There was also no image included, and I do feel that the page could benefit from having another, as it only has one and also mentions the distinction between two subspecies but lacks the information to educate the reader on how they are distinguishable. This could be a good photo option to include, or maybe a photo of their typical environment.