User:Brittn3/sandbox

Article Evaluation of "Chrildren's Crusade"

Article lacks clarification footnote "1" for apocryphal definition.

There are links that don't exist and are clearly highlighted red.

Article is also lacking clarification on "who" for the modern account footnote.

There is an entire paragraph that has the same footnotes for the same book.

Under the historiography section, the writer is clearly making an assumption about Raedts.

There are some links that don't work as well.

Definition of "puer" is also not working or listed in the article.

11:16 am, 1, November, 2017