User:BrodyKRS/2020 Canadian pipeline and railway protests/LOC2020 Peer Review

Peer review
==== '''Great work, you did an excellent job at chronologically identifying the events that have taken place at Wet'suwet'en First Nation, thus far. Your source 13, was an excellent document to use and allows the reader to be informed without bias. The sources cited, that provide background of the languages and culture of the Wet'suwet'en band, were perfectly chosen-directly from the Wet'suwet'en people. By using a source reflective of the Wet'suwet'en people, this contributes to the Wet'suwet'en people being fairly represented, in a world where they have been misrepresented. I did recognize Indigenous not capitalized in the beginning of your article, which may be changed. Taken from Gregory Younging's guide, to support capitalizing Indigenous:''' ====

==== All written work will be held to high standards and as a course that privileges Indigenous knowledges and epistemologies, your work should reflect Younging’s Indigenous Style Guide and the following guidelines[1] set by the peer-reviewed journal Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education, and Society: ==== '''a. Indigenous: In recognition of the communities of identity connected by the term, we strongly recommend all submissions capitalize the term ‘Indigenous’ in all contexts. Decolonization believes that the term "Indigenous" is a deeply politicized one; it evokes shared historical memory, cultural meanings, and particular political interests. By spelling "indigenous" with a lower case "i" we un/knowingly reproduce dominant writing traditions that seek to minimize and subjugate Indigenous knowledges and people. All authors are encouraged to explore the politics of their language choices, both in submitted texts and broader conversation.'''

'''In the lead section, it states "civil disobedience" which may be changed, possibly to something less bias and reflective of both parties. Lastly, I felt the noun "protesters" in the "2020" timeline section could be changed, also to be more reflective of both parties.'''