User:BrokenCookies/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Be (BTS album)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this topic because I love BTS and was curious to see what their wikipedia looked like. I chose this specific album because I remember it having some backlash from fans. I originally thought this album did not do as great of numbers as their previous albums, however reading the article, I can see the success it had.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The first sentence is a very basic understanding of what BE is. Reading further down the first little paragraph, there is a good wrap up of what the album was about. The lead also includes information that is presented in the article. The reader can see the love that the author may have for BTS, as the article seems positive about them.

The content seems to be relevant and up to date. They include relevant events that BTS did for their album BE. Something I believe that should be talked about a little more are the other producers and writers in the album. The Songs and Music and Lyrics section do not mention the producers much, but they are credited at the end on a list.

The overall tone I feel is positive for BTS and the album. There is a critical reception part of the article where it shows some feedback from critics, but they are all positive. There is no room for controversy which can be a good thing. The article does come across as positive for BTS and the success of their album. I feel that the authors did a good job at making sure the success was credited towards the album and not so much the boy band BTS itself. The interpretations for the songs are all source based from credible sources, so there is not a lot of argument there.

The sources seem to be credible, however, there are a couple news outlets that seem like blogs. Most of the sources are from articles which is okay, but articles like Refinery 29 can sometimes be biased. The sources are as current as the album, 2020. I have clicked on a few and they all seem to run fine. Some of the sources however do not contain an additional source, it is just what the author wrote themselves.

The organization is clear and follows a flow. Everything is in place and has correct format. Couple run on sentences

The images are well captures however there should be more. There is a picture of Taylor Swift yet not one single picture of BTS. This should be changed. The images are cited.

The talk page includes some questions and requests to change things. there is even a small argument about whether the album was a studio album or EP. This talk page has too much controversy and going back and forth, when it should be respectful.

The article seems well developed and there is a lot of known facts about the album, as well as newer awards I was not aware of. The article's flow in ideas seems to be a good strength. I would improve on some of the sources being said, because why is this author important and why does it matter what this blog is saying?