User:Brontosh/Photo-referencing/JulianaRios11 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Brontosh


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Brontosh/Photo-referencing


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Photo-referencing

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

-The lead is short and concise, and successfully conveys the point of the article! If you eventually add sub sections, this would be a good place to briefly summarize them.

Content:

-As of right now, the content that has been added is relevant to the topic and well described. I'm not sure what other avenues exist for further elaboration on the topic, but I think that an expanded subsection about where this technique has been used in art history or pop culture could be a good place to start, considering how the current article is very brief.

Tone and Balance:

-The tone and balance are well maintained, and everything added so far is unbiased and presented from a neutral viewpoint.

Sources and References:

-The sources included in the bibliography look relevant and recent! I would recommend putting them in your sandbox draft as well so that your currently uncited material doesn't get hit for plagiarism.

Organization:

-I think that if further expansion beyond what is already included is possible it would be good to add subsections! Currently I feel like I'm reviewing a somewhat similar topic and running into a similar wall, so I totally understand the problem with trying to expand an article when there doesn't seem to be much more info to add. Other than that, I noticed a spelling error or two.