User:Bruce2413/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Mass spectrometry

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because mass spectrometery is what I focus on for undergrad and graduate researches. It would be much easier for me to identify the structure of the information and understand major contents of the article.

Evaluate the article
The lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes what is mass spectrometry. It also includes a well-writen table of contents that contains the major sections of the article. No information mentioned in the lead was not presented in the article. The lead is detailed yet very concise. The article's content is relevant to the topic of mass spectrometry. I did not see anything out of date but some sections seemed to only have minimal information on it. It also might be an intentional thing because these sections often have their own wiki pages. The tone of the whole article was kept neutral and unbiased. I randomly checked few citation links and they work well. Since most of these links lead me to published papers with reliable journals, they are considered reliable to me. The talk page only had few posts but it's understandable since the article is rated as a level-4 vital article in science. It's also interested by WikiProjects of Chemistry, Physics and Mass Spectrometry.