User:BruceNaing/Propaganda through media/Sarahmaemartin Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? BruceNaing
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:BruceNaing/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes, it might benefit from adding more detailed description to the introduction.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? See first bullet.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? See first bullet.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? See first bullet.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise, but may need more information on different companies or definitions and examples in the media.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, most within the past decade.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? More elaboration on each type of propaganda would help the article.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes it is thorough. The topic is broad so it will be difficult to reflect all available literature.
 * Are the sources current? Yes, most within the past decade.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, it can be broken down even more to different examples of each type of Propaganda.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? N/A
 * Are images well-captioned? N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? N/A

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? Amount of articles follows assignment guidelines. To answer the second question (similar to an earlier question), the topic is very broad so it probably isn't possible to represent all available literature.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Yes, through different types of propaganda.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes, through references below the article.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? More explanation and examples in the real world would help.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Clear organization.
 * How can the content added be improved? Add more content overall and any applicable media.

Overall evaluation
'''Overall, a great and clear start. Looking forward to the final article!'''