User:Bruisingspace01/Poppaea Sabina/Romalicious753 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Bruisingspace01
 * User:Bruisingspace01/Poppaea Sabina

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * The lead has not been updated. But this could be due too the already substantial information provided by the previous author(s).
 * The lead introduction in the original article provides good background information including that of her name and how she was named after her mother. Not sure if I should find this cute of disturbing due to the information that the TedEd video on life of women in Ancient Rome provided.
 * The lead does not provided a brief description of the article's major sections. You could use this and expand the lead as part of our project if you are still looking for ways to improve the article! :)
 * The lead does a fine job at not adding any extra information that does not show up in the article elsewhere.
 * Although the lead could use some expanding on some of the topics that will be in the article. The lead is quick and to the point. This is nice, because it mean that you can expand it a bit, but do not need to worry about doing a ton of work!

Lead evaluation
Although you do not spend anytime on the lead in your sandbox, I trust that you will re-look over it once you get this feedback back. Along with that, I understand that the lead was not worked on, because even I did not think about working on the lead to my article, and who really wants to focus on a lead when you can talk about her marriage to Nero? But I do encourage you to come back to this section! :)

Content
Guiding questions:


 * I love the content that you are adding! Keep up the good work.
 * The content does a good job at being up to date. It is hard to find relevant content when the subject is a couple thousand years old. But you make due with the sources that you have to work with.
 * I am not sure if there is any content missing outside of what you are going to be expanding and what is already in the og article.
 * I think your topic does a good job at expanding the history of ancient women in Rome! It is a topic that has little coverage and you are working hard to expand that! Yay knowledge!

Content evaluation
I love the content that you are adding. The expansion of her and Nero's relationship is going to grain the attention to a lot of readers who go to this article.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * The content added does a great job with expanding the limited information on her in a natural way for the audience.
 * Both your sandbox and the main article keeps a good natural tone.
 * I do not see any points of views that go over the top. It could be easy to try and make an argument for her either one way or another, but you and the past editor(s) maintain a good neutrality.
 * One could make the argument that the content in the og article has a some stuff added that might make the reader believe that was a bad person due to her relationship with Nero. But a reader has to keep in mind about the limited information added and the fact that the actions taken where of her own. However, if any positive stuff is to arise, be sure to add that along with the negative.

Tone and balance evaluation
The tone in both articles maintain a good natural feeling. The balance of content is more on the side that she did a fair amount of bad things, but even with that content, the editor(s) try to keep it natural.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * The content added is to the point and easy to understand while reading.
 * The content does not have any grammar or spelling errs and is to the point.
 * The content on the main page has a clear cohesion to it that makes it easier for the reader to understand and read through.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * The og article does. The student editor has not added any other images. But that is ok, not all projects will need images added to them by the student editor.
 * The images on the main page have good an informative captions under them that follow Wikipediae guidelines.
 * All imagines adhere to the Wikipediae image rules.
 * I like the way that the og page has the images laid out. It makes for a fun and compelling read through.

Images and media evaluation
Although you do not have any images to add, the ones already on the page does a fine job at getting the point across.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * You did a really nice job at finding two secondary sources to get your information from. It can be hard find secondary sources that just do not feel like a rehashing of the primary sources. Good work!
 * The sources do a really great job at getting to the information in a scholarly and informative way.
 * Your source section though could use some work. I know that you are probably going to just add them into the already existing source box on the og page. But if you make its own little spot for your sources, you will be able to keep better track of them.
 * I love all of the direct links to other articles that you have! It is so much fun when a page lets to another page and then another and you just get lost in the sources.

New Article Evaluation
You do a really good job at staying true to the original page's info, yet adding your own unique information. The sources that you have chosen are strong and reliable! Good work! Keep it up! :)

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * The content added does a nice job at improving the information provided in the og text. It expands some of the most compelling information.
 * Your topic on her rule and her death are fascinating and make for as fun of a read that you can have for a Wikipediae article.
 * I would really like to know more about her marriages before Nero. It will be hard getting more information for those sections. But I feel like if you can add to those, you can make this Wiki really special!

Overall evaluation
I love what you are doing! You are expanding a historical figure who lived during a time when women did not have much written down! Good on you for choosing to tackle such a big challenge to not only improve your knowledge, but the knowledge of the thousands of readers that will come after you are done here! Good work! Keep it up! But be sure to take a mental break every now and again! You got this!