User:BrunoSlugo/Ras Muhammad National Park/Sunnyyp Peer Review

General info
BrunoSlugo
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BrunoSlugo/Ras_Muhammad_National_Park/Bibliography?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_bibliography
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ras Muhammad National Park
 * Ras Muhammad National Park

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead - Introductory sentence is concise and explains what the reader will be learning about. It also implies what the article will be talking about but could include more information on some of the article's major sections

Content - content added is relevant to the topic. It can be seen that some sections to lack sufficient information and the reviewer added some extra information for better explanation. Sources are relatively recent and are from credible sources. For example, one source the editor was planning on adding was from the International Journal of Environmental Sciences.

Tone & Balance - Content added is very neutral, it is factual. The claims added are not heavily biased, they just provide more context and information about the historical context

Sources & Reference - New content is from a credible Science Journal and news outlet and they are related to the topic being discussed in the article. As mentioned earlier, sources are new and up to date. A suggestion would be to find some sources on the climate. This section seems to be lacking information compared to the other sections. You could include information about the biome and how the temperatures impact aspects of the park.

Organization - Since the article is pretty short, I would consider expanding on the sections presented or maybe creating new sections on the habitat or the animals. No grammatical errors.

Images & Media - The editor added a picture of the mangroves within the national park. I was added with proper Wikipedia licensing and the caption is done properly.

Overall Impressions - I think the content the editor is planning on adding is relevant and will help boost the quality of information within the article. The sources are strong but I would suggest finding a couple more to help diversify the information within one section and not relying on one source for an entire section. I believe adding a few more sections would be a great plan.