User:Brute55/sandbox

= Article Evaluation = The article under evaluation is "Sexuality in Japan".


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

Most things are some what relevant however, information seems to be spread out with no real order. Something I found odd / distracting and or out off place was that the very first section in this article after the initial introduction was "Pornography". Pornography is a sub topic to sexuality and thus relates differently to various sexuality's.


 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

Skimming through the source dates, most are from the first decade of the 2000's. Research could be done to see if the sources still hold merit or could be refreshed.


 * What else could be improved?

The Article could be better organized. One example of this that I thought of was starting off with the 3 most known sexuality's. The three of which being Heterosexual, homosexual, and bisexual. From here one could do research on each of them individually and the rolls they play in Japan along with their history there.


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

From what I see, yes. This is mainly because over half of the article is just a description of various pornography.


 * Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented?

Pornography is over represented. There are multiple aspects that are underrepresented, such as homosexuality which is mentioned but not enough content.