User:BryanC194/sandbox

Article: Sustainable consumption

Edits:


 * Remove any potentially leading or bias statements
 * Rework introduction
 * Review grammar

Contributions:

Bibliography:
 * Introduce oppositional perspective
 * Greatly introduce historical implications and interpretations
 * Review economic implications
 * Add onto forms of sustainable behavior

Create reference sheet

- Edits

Remove any Potentially leading or bias statements

Some statements were removed or I have provided edits of my own within the rework introduction section.

Rework Introduction

Edit: "From a conventional marketing..." To: Conventional marketing largely focuses on consumer behavior at the purchasing stage of the total consumption process.

Edit: "Yet from a social..." To: To be effective, consumer behavior could focus on all states of the consumption process to determine the overall behavior patterns of consumers.

Review Grammar:

Toward behavior change: contains grammar inconsistencies. View introduction paragraph, second, and third.

Most grammatical errors have been removed since the last time I reviewed the article. Stick to toward behavior change.

-Contributions:

Intro Definition: ''Sustainable Consumption Governance: A History of Promises and Failures. Journal of Consumer Policy''

'''Alternatively, the Oslo symposium has defined sustainable consumption as the consumption of goods and services that enhance quality of life while limiting the use of natural resources and noxious materials. Consumption that does not threaten future generations (*Quote: Oslo symposium).'''

Ecological Awareness: Sustainable Consumption: The Psychology of Individual Choice, Identity, and Behavior

'''The recognition that human well being is interwoven with the natural environment. (Leviston, Walker, Green, & Price, 2018). An interest to change human activities that cause environmental harm.'''

“Types”/Historical/Background: ''Sustainable Consumption Governance: A History of Promises and Failures. Journal of Consumer Policy''

'''Strong sustainable consumption refers to participating in viable environmental activities. Consumption of renewable and efficient goods and services (Example: electric locomotive, cycling, renewable energy). Contrarily, weak sustainable consumption is the failure to adhere to strong sustainable consumption. In other words, consumption of highly polluting activities. Such as frequent car use and consumption of non biodegradable goods (Example: plastic items, metals, and mixed fabrics). The 1992 Earth Summit found that sustainable consumption rather than sustainable production and development is at the center of political discourse. (1992 Earth Summit Citation) With weak sustainable consumption receiving some attention while strong sustainable consumption has not been discussed.'''

'''Currently, strong sustainable consumption is only present in minimal precincts of discussion and research. International government organizations’ (IGOs) prerogatives have kept away from strong sustainable consumption. To avoid scrutiny, IGOs have deemed their influences as limited and constrained, often aligning its interests with consumer wants and needs (Cite). With advocating for minimal eco-efficient improvements. Government skepticism towards sustainable consumption committed to minimal strong sustainable consumption.'''

Cultural Shifts: ''Murphy, F. (2017). Austerity Ireland, the New Thrift Culture and Sustainable Consumption. Journal of Business Anthropology, 6(2), 158.''

'''Ethnographic research in Ireland concluded that the Post Financial Crisis of 2007-2008, saw an increase in second hand shopping and communal gardening (cite). Following a series of financial scandals, “Austerity Ireland” (link) became a cultural movement. Irish consumer confidence fell, sparking a culture shift in second-hand markets and charities (Lambkin 2016). Emphasis on sustainability drove a narrative around economic recovery.'''

Historical implications and interpretations

Current political and economic positions and their relationships with past promises and failures: Review Failures and promises

Ethnographic research of second-hand markets and their relation to economic crisis. How has it changed people’s consumption habits in Irish society: Cultural Shifts

Relevant Economic Implications

Shifting markets present new challenges in production and transporation

Review economic implications within article and present current informations/implications

Forms of Sustainable Behavior:


 * Psychological: individual choice

Sources:

- Economic

Luthra, Sunil, Govindan, Kannan, & Mangla, Sachin Kumar. (2017). Structural model for sustainable consumption and production adoption—A grey-DEMATEL based approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 125, 198–207.

Hüttel, Alexandra, Ziesemer, Florence, Peyer, Mathias, & Balderjahn, Ingo. (2018). To purchase or not? Why consumers make economically (non-)sustainable consumption choices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 827–836.

- Historical Failures and Promises: Fuchs, Doris A, & Lorek, Sylvia. (2005). Sustainable Consumption Governance: A History of Promises and Failures. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28(3), 261–288

Supply chain evolution: Govindan, K. (2018). Sustainable consumption and production in the food supply chain: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 419–431.

Cultural Shifts across the UK (Ireland): Murphy, F. (2017). Austerity Ireland, the New Thrift Culture and Sustainable Consumption. Journal of Business Anthropology, 6(2), 158.

- Oppositional Perspectives

Radical versus realistic: Perrels, A. (2008). Wavering between radical and realistic sustainable consumption policies: in search for the best feasible trajectories. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(11), 1203–1217.

- Psychological

Individual Choice: Ruby, Matthew B, Walker, Iain, & Watkins, Hanne M. (2020). Sustainable Consumption: The Psychology of Individual Choice, Identity, and Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 76(1), 8–18