User:Bsien002/Microgravity Bioprinting/Manvely Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Bsien002


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Microgravity bioprinting


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Microgravity bioprinting

Evaluate the drafted changes
- Lead has a good introduction to the article, very consice and gets the point across.

- The content is good, I really like the History section that goes year by year.

- the applications section does a well job of explaining the different applications of microgravity bioprinting as it relates to different fields.

- the impact section is a good way to wrap-up the article and summarize the main benefits and points.

- the tone of the article is neutral; maybe only the last section in the impact section seems like you're coming to a conclusion but since you do have a reference I would need to do more work to find out.

- I like the pictures of the actual printer in the lead section and the other pictures as well. they add a lot to the article to actually be able to see what this printer looks like

- overall, you did a pretty good job and the article looks great!