User:Bszymanski10/sandbox2

= Article Evaluation—Paula de Eguiluz =

Evaluating content
==
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Everything that appears in this article is relevant to the topic of Paula de Eguiliz. The article discussed relevant background information as well as the two most significant stories regarding her life. After reading through the article, there was nothing that was distracting.


 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? Since this article was written about a person from the 17th century, I do not believe that any of the information is out of date. Additionally, from what I currently know about Paula de Eguiluz there is nothing missing.


 * What else could be improved? The article could be lengthened, as there are currently only sections regarding her early life and career.  ==

Evaluating tone
==
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The tone of the article is indeed neutral. It is biographically written, and does not attempt to sway the opinions of readers in one way or another. The article stated facts and stories regarding her life in a matter-of-fact way. I did not recognize any claims that appeared heavily biased.


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Viewpoints regarding de Eguiluz are represented fairly evenly throughout the article.  ==

Evaluating sources
==
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? All three of the links that I clicked on worked. However, two of the three sources I clicked on were written in Spanish, so I could not properly evaluate whether or not the sources support the article. The third source, written in English, did support the article.


 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? All facts appear to be referenced with appropriate, reliable references. I found it interesting that all of the sources were referenced at the end of each paragraph, instead of after each specific fact or statement. The information in this article comes from a variety of sources, including various journal articles and books written about Paula de Eguiluz. It is somewhat concerning that more than half of the sources come from one article, though. All of the sources appear to be neutral, and I did not detect bias in any of them.  ==

Checking the talk page
== Now take a look at how others are talking about this article on the talk page.


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There are no conversations happening on the talk page.


 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It is rated as C-Class and is part of the projects WikiProject Articles for creationand WikiProject Biography.


 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? The Wikipedia article provides more information regarding specific life events than what we covered in class.   ==