User:Bt021/Atlantic humpback dolphin/Egk006 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Bt021


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bt021/Atlantic_humpback_dolphin?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Atlantic humpback dolphin

Evaluate the drafted changes
I like how you are keeping track of your changes in the sandbox, and especially what sources you are using in your bibliography. I honestly may move my bibliography to my sandbox draft like you did, because I think it'll be easier to keep track of what I use and how I use them.

It looks like you have mainly focused on updating the description of the article. You did add important information such as the color, however I think you may have deleted the part about the dolphin's teeth. Instead of saying "other morphological differences," consider highlighting the differences, such as the teeth. Another thing you could do with this section is include links to specific Wikipedia articles throughout. For example, you could provide an in-text link to the Indo-Pacific Humpback, so that readers can easily have access to information on that species. It is good though how you included links to citations throughout this paragraph.

Just a suggestion (you may have already been planning to do this): consider adding a picture of the dolphin. On the actual article, there is only a small line drawing of the dolphin, so it would help the article a lot to include some pictures.

Again, you were probably going to do this anyways, but consider adding a conservation status section to your article. The "Interaction with humans" section could be moved under the conservation section.