User:Bt021/Atlantic humpback dolphin/Menacing djungelskog Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Bt021


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bt021/Atlantic_humpback_dolphin?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Atlantic humpback dolphin
 * Atlantic humpback dolphin

Evaluate the drafted changes
The main article has not been updated to reflect the editor's changes. The first sentence in the Lead is quite short and could be expanded upon to include details/sections of the entire article. The article's major sections could be outlined in the Lead to direct the reader attention and give a sense of structure to the article. At the moment, the Lead is very concise, but could use some more details.

So far, the author has expanded upon existing sections in the article and added new ones. Everything that was written in the article is bolded, all new information added is in regular typeface. The content added by the author is very relevant to the article. They have added to the some of the existing sections, including description, habitat and range, behavior and diet, and interaction with humans. They plan to add new sections on conservation and threats.

The tone of the information added to the article is neutral and scientific. There's no attempt to persuade or sway readers towards a certain viewpoint. The sources seem to be mostly up-to-date and they seem like they are reputable sources. The article seems to have a highly-organized structure with a clear outline. The author added two images of maps, one showing the continent of Africa and the other showing an oil pollution map. The map of Africa doesn't seem specific enough to the article. Instead a map of where the species lives and migrates should be included, if possible. Two additional images were added, one of a habitat zone map and the other of a dolphin jumping out of the water. The images seem to be well-captioned, but I couldn't find the source section for the images. The content added has greatly improved the article in that it's includes more detailed sections, is very organized, and has visually appealing images. I think this author is on the right track with their article and should continue to make edits to keep improving the article.