User:Btareen/2018 Fiji earthquake/JS4472 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Btareen)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Btareen/2018_Fiji_earthquake?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

You described the lead section being successful in terms of hooking the audience to the article through descriptions of time, date, and location of the epicenter which is good, but I would describe the second part of the lead section in more detail when you talk about information on the section being overly detailed. I like how you described the tone of the article being informative to the audience rather than trying to persuade them, this tells the reader the article is stating facts and information. The 2018 Fiji earthquake article also shows readers stats through images such as a cross-section diagram showing the Pacific slab under the Fijian Islands and the epicenters for both earthquakes, you could add this to support your answer of the article aiming to inform the audience rather than persuade. Sources are descriptive and clearly state the amount and which ones can be used to support the topic effectively. Overall i would say your article is off to a strong start and has potential to be good, I would recommend adding more information and being more descriptive in certain sections though.