User:Btareen/2018 Fiji earthquake/Smf7462 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Btareen, Brybene, Alee0046, Ssathien


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Btareen/2018 Fiji earthquake
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 2018 Fiji earthquake

Evaluate the drafted changes
The proposed additions to the article look good so far, they are well written and properly cited. The history of earthquakes in Fiji is a good addition because according to the original article the earthquake had little damage and the resulting tsunami was small. If there is any information about the effects of the earthquake on the surrounding islands. I think the lead section of the original article was good, but some of the more in depth information could be moved so that the lead is more general. The sources used in the draft seem to be reliable and are well cited. The article could use more pictures of the islands and any destruction that occurred even if it was minimal. The article draft is well balanced and has no bias so far. Overall the additions to the article are good and if the other changes and additions made are similar they full article should be pretty good.

Bryce Benedick Response
I completely agree with your suggestions and think it would be smart to look into effects on the surrounding islands. I also agree that it is smart to free up the lead section because you are correct it is not general enough to be a lead section. I also like the idea of adding more pictures of any destruction.