User:Btn0238/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelangelo_phenomenon

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I'm choosing this article because it's the one that covers the topic I hope to expand. It matters as one of the few models that looks at other people can impact self growth. My impression is that the existing article could use more details in its explanations of key concepts.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead section

The lead section is concise and includes an introductory sentence that clearly describes the article's topic. It, however, does not include all of the major sections of the article, and it includes information that is not present in the article.

Content

Most of the content is relevant to the topic except for the second portion of the lead section. The content is not as up to date as it could be given that more research has been conducted on the MP (Michelangelo phenomenon). The article doesn't deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and balance

The article is neutral. It does not present opinions but merely states findings from research on a natural phenomenon.

Sources and References

There are several statements throughout the article that aren't backed up by a reliable source of information. Sources are relatively current, given the slow pace of research. I checked a few links and they seem to work.

Organization and writing quality

The organization makes sense, and the writing is relatively easy to read. Jargon is explained when one first appears in the article.

Images and Media

The image of the model does enhance understanding of the processes, but it might not adhere to copyright regulations.

Talk page discussionThe article is rated as stub class. It is part of WikiProject Psychology. I don't see any conversation on the article's topic.