User:Bubbles the fish/Evaluate an Article

Belt transect
(Provide a link to the article here.)

One of the article options for this assignment. There is very little writing on the page with not a lot of information.
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

== Lead section: There is a concise description of the topic. There is only a lead section, which has two sentences. There are links to descriptions of words used in the article. There are no descriptions of other sections because there are no other sections. Content: There is only a brief summary of what a belt transect is. The article has not covered the important aspects of the topic, belt transect. Content is relevant to topic and up to date. Not enough content for the topic. Tone and Balance: the article is neutral. Sources and References: The links all work. The links all have information about the article topic. This is a topic that hasn't changed much over the years, therefore it is up to date. Organization and writing quality: The article is clear, concise, and easy to read. The sentences are long and run-on. There is no organization with sections because there are no sections. Images and Media: There are neither. Talk page discussion: There is no discussion on the talk page. ==

== Overall impressions: This article is good with the conciseness of the information, but it is lacking more information on the topic. The article is poorly developed. To improve this article there can be more information added to it. Such as, how to do a belt transect, the history of it. There can also be images added. ==

(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)