User:Buenviajec/sandbox

Collective bargaining article
Choose Your Article - Evaluate Your Article


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Are some areas under- or over-developed?
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Does each claim have a citation? Are the citations reliable?
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?

The lead paragraph is not as concise as it has repetitive verbiage. The second last sentence of the second paragraph is almost identical to the first sentence of the first leading paragraph. The second paragraph of the leading section is cited and seemed to have neglected the information already provided in the first leading paragraph.

The International protection section is under-developed specifically regarding the Canadian Supreme Court information and quote it provided. The article mentions how the Supreme Court of Canada regards collective bargaining as a human right and that the court made the following (mentioned) observations but the article does not mention what legislations are protecting said Canadian human rights. What specifically has protected Canadian employees and labour unions regarding collective bargaining and what were the outcomes of the collective agreements?

The general consensus of the article's neutrality is questioned and mentioned quite a few times in the article's Talk page.