User:Buffy2021/Golden Retriever/ToriCheer18 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Buffy2021


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Buffy2021/Golden Retriever


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Golden Retriever

Lead

 * Yes, the lead includes an introductory sentence that is clear and concise and describes the article's topic well.
 * No, the lead does not include a brief description of the article's major sections.
 * No, the lead does not include information that is not present in the article.
 * In my opinion, the lead is a little overly detailed and could be a little more clear and straight to the point.

Content

 * No, there does nit seem to be any content missing or that does not belong in the article.
 * No, this article does not deal with Wikipedia's equality gaps and it also does not address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics.

Tone and Balance

 * No, there doesn't seem to be any claims that are heavily biased toward a particular position.
 * There also doesn't seem to be any viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented.

Sources and References

 * Yes, the content accurately reflects what the sources cited say.
 * Yes, the sources are thorough.
 * Yes, the sources are current as well.
 * Yes, the sources are written by a diverse spectrum of authors.
 * Yes, I think there are always better sources out there but the sources used work just fine.


 * Yes, the link do work.