User:Bulldogs2021/sandbox

Paragraph: This helps you set the style of the text. For example, a header, or plain paragraph text. You can also use it to offset block quotes.

A : Highlight your text, then click here to format it with bold, italics, etc. The "More" options allows you to underline, add code snippets, and change language keyboards.

Links: The chain button allows you to link your text. Highlight the word, and push the button. The visual editor will automatically suggest related Wikipedia articles for that word or phrase. This is a great way to connect your article to more Wikipedia content. You only have to link important words once, usually during the first time they appear. If you want to link to pages outside of Wikipedia (for an "external links" section, for example) click on the "External link" tab.

Cite: The citation tool in the visual editor helps format your citations. You can simply paste a DOI or URL, and the visual editor will try to sort out all of the fields you need. Be sure to review it, however, and apply missing fields manually (if you know them). You can also add books, journals, news, and websites manually. That opens up a quick guide for inputting your citations. Finally, you can click the "re-use" tab if you've already added a source and just want to cite it again.

Bullets: To add bullet points or a numbered list, click here.

Insert: This tab lets you add media, images, or tables.

Ω The final tab allows you to add special characters, such as those found in non-English words, scientific notation, and a handful of language extensions.

Article Evaluation
After reading through the different articles, I found that a lot of the information in the article about Malawi was relevant, but there was definitely information that did not need to be included for the article to have the same effect. I found, from reading the articles, that they were also fairly neutral in the information represented within them. I did not pick up on any information that could be considered biased, as many different perspectives were described. The second article seems as though it is definitely just a starting point. The second article is more broad, and could include a link to the first article, but it is definitely rough, which is why it would inspire me more to dig deeper. From reading the first article, I thought there was a fair representation for all viewpoints, especially because there is a "See Also" section where the article linked any information that could have been left out. The second article, however, is obviously lacking in context. All of the links/citations that I checked out from the reference section worked when I clicked on them, and for the most part the information from the sources matches up with what is portrayed in the article. Looking through the article, each fact was supported with a citation, however I found one site that I think was biased, but was not noted in the article, which could be problematic. Since the article is fairly new, I did not find anything to be outdated, however, some of the facts and figures about population demographics could be edited and updated to make it more recent. After going through the talk page, it seems that this article has underwent some serious revision over time, but after a recent review, it seems to be an acceptable article. There were some close paraphrasing issues resolved, but for the most part there is no talk of any major changes that need to be made. This article is rated pretty well and is an interest in multiple WikiProjects. This topic differs from the articles we have talked about in class, because it gives many perspectives and covers a lot more material at once, which not a lot of the articles from our class do. Overall, I thought the article was done very well.

What is a Content Gap?
A content gap occurs when a topic is covered on Wikipedia, but not to the extent to which it should be. For example, not every perspective is given on a certain topic, or there is a certain amount of critical information that is missing from the article. I believe that there are a few reasons as to why a content gap may arise on Wikipedia. First, the person who was writing that article might not have known enough about the topic to give it a good representation. A few other reasons that this might come up would be to controversial topics, where the person might not want to include certain information that is required to give a full perspective of a topic, or this might occur because not enough sources are being used, and there is some critical information that might not be well written about. Personally, I think the only thing that matters with respect to who can write on Wikipedia would be whether or not the person is doing it for the right reasons, and is following the community guidelines. As long as someone is writing something that will include new information that is unbiased and well represented, and they follow the community guidelines, anyone could write on Wikipedia. On Wikipedia, being biased means that you are not representing a topic from an independent position. I do not think my personal definition of bias is much different from what Wikipedia considers bias to be, but I find that one thing about Wikipedia is that it is important not to draw conclusions from the article that is being written. The conclusions being drawn from the article should be left up to the reader.

What Will I Add to "HIV/AIDS in Angola" ?
Immediately when I looked at this article I saw the notice at the top that stated that the article relied on only a single source. Therefore, the information in the article is limited and there are several more sources that can be used complete the article. Also, the information in the article could be updated due to recent information and data on HIV/AIDS in Angola. I would also like to include the information about how HIV/AIDS is transmitted specifically in Angola.

Bibliography for Article
"Analytical Summary - HIV/AIDS." Angola:Analytical Summary - HIV/AIDS - AHO. N.p., 10 June 2010. Web.

"Angola." Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 20 May 2016. Web.

"Angola." UNAIDS. N.p., 29 Oct. 2014. Web.

"The United States President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief." Partnering to Achieve Epidemic Control in Angola. N.p., n.d. Web.

Copy Edit Due for 10/26/17 - Now Rough Draft for Article
Below is my rough draft for the article.

= HIV/AIDS in Angola = Angola has a large HIV/AIDS infected population. However, it has one of the lowest prevalence rates in the Southern Africa zone. The status of the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Angola is expected to change within the near future due to several forms of behavioral, cultural, and economic characteristics within the country such as lack of knowledge and education, low levels of condom use, the frequency of sex and number of sex partners, economic disparities and migration. There is a significant amount of work being done in Angola to combat the epidemic, but most aid is coming from outside of the country.

Prevalence
While the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) estimated adult prevalence at the end of 2003 at 3.9%, recent statistics from the Angolan Ministry of Health and the National AIDS Control Program demonstrate a prevalence of 2.8% among pregnant women who are seeking prenatal care. While the low rate seems to be a good thing, the prevalence could soon mimic the rapid upward trajectory experienced in other African countries.

Since 2003, Angola has made progress towards reducing the prevalence of HIV/AIDS in its population. At the end of 2016, it was estimated that 280,000 people were living with HIV/AIDS in Angola, which corresponds to a prevalence percentage of approximately 2.2% among adults aged 15-49 years old. New infections among people of all ages as of 2016 has shown a decrease from previous years, landing at an approximation of 25,000 cases. However, AIDS related deaths in Angola reached an all time high in 2016 peaking at approximately 11,000 by the end of the year.

By gender
HIV/AIDS is more prevalent in the female population of adults aged 15 years and older with an estimated 160,000 living with the disease - a prevalence of 2.2% of the female population. While HIV/AIDS is less prevalent in men, the disease still affects an estimated 110,000 individuals living with the disease - a prevalence of 1.5% among the male population in Angola.

HIV testing and treatment
While prevalence of HIV/AIDS is low in Angola compared to surrounding countries, the diagnosis and treatment of the disease is a top health priority. As of 2016, approximately 40% of people living with HIV/AIDS know there status. Of the people who know their status, approximately 62,000 people are on Antiretroviral Therapy (ART), which is 22% of the total population of people living with HIV/AIDS in the country. Also, 45,000 of all individuals on ART have suppressed viral load, which is a significant percentage of the population on ART, but only represents 16% of people living with HIV/AIDS in Angola. One of the international problems that arises after individuals are placed on ART is the ability for them to stay on the treatment regimen. This is seen in Angola as well, as only 39% of all individuals placed on ART are known to have been still taking it 12 months after beginning treatment.

History
The 27-year civil war in Angola, lasting from 1975 until 2002, kept the spread of HIV to a minimum due to large parts of the country being inaccessible to people infected with the virus. During the civil war, individuals from neighboring countries such as Zambia, Botswana, and Zimbabwe (all countries with high prevalence rates of HIV) were also not allowed to come into the country, which played a significant role in controlling the spread of HIV. However, since the end of the war, transportation routes between countries and within the country ave reopened and communication between neighboring countries and Angola has reopened, thus providing a greater potential for the spread of HIV/AIDS.

In Angola, about 70% of the population is under the age of 24 years old. In 2003, a knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) survey was conducted among people aged 14 to 24 years old. This survey revealed that approximately 43% of young people surveyed were having sex by the age of 15. This prevalence of sex at such early ages in Angola makes it one of the highest rates in the world. On top of the high rates of sex at early ages, there is a considerable lack of access to condoms, lack of access to adequate health care, a high incidence of sexually transmitted infections, and high rates of commercial sex work in Angola, which are some of the largest barriers to overcome when dealing with HIV prevention in Angola and are all conditions that leave the country ripe for a spike in HIV.

HIV in Angola is transmitted primarily through heterosexual sex with multiple partners, with a male-to-female ratio of 0.8:1, indicating that women are more likely to be infected than men. However, HIV prevalence rates among men who have sex with men are higher than the national average. Contaminated needles, medical devices, and blood transfusions are the second largest spreader of HIV/AIDS, although more specific research in this area is needed.

National response
HIV is not the only problem that Angola is facing, as the country is also dealing with extreme economic, social, and political problems. Approximately 68% of the population lives in poverty, and 26% of those living in poverty are living in extreme poverty. Despite these previously mentioned issues that Angola is facing, the Angolan government has made significant efforts to work within the country as well as with international donors and foundations to combat the HIV/AIDS epidemic. All of these efforts have been put in place to work towards delivering HIV/AIDS prevention methods to the public.

The national AIDS Control Program [Programa Nacional de Luta contra o Sida (PNLS)] was established within the Ministry of Health in 1987. This program was put in place to serve as a way to fight against the HIV/AIDS epidemic as a nation. Most of the financing of this program has come from external donations to helping the country.

The National AIDS Commission was established in 2002 to work towards a better high-level governmental attention to the HIV/AIDS epidemic. The developmental strategy resulting from the creation of this commission called for a special attention to a plethora of vulnerable populations within Angola: sex workers, truck drivers, mine workers, military personnel, youth, street children, pregnant women, dislocated people, refugees and resettled populations, prisoners, injecting drug users, blood transfusion recipients, traditional healers, traditional birth attendants, health workers, and children living with or affected by HIV/AIDS.

In June 2004, the Angolan National Assembly passed a comprehensive HIV/AIDS law with the purpose of "protecting and promoting full health through the adoption of measures needed to prevent, control, treat and investigate HIV/AIDS". The law was put into place in efforts to protect the rights of the individuals living in Angola who are living with HIV/AIDS. Protections resulting from this law include the right to employment, free public health care, and confidentiality within the country's health care system.

Angola has developed national guidelines for providing integrated care to people living with HIV/AIDS. However, the mechanisms for distributing antiretroviral drugs need to be implemented outside of Luanda, a problem that is seen throughout several nations in Africa and around the world dealing with this epidemic.

Thus far, the low HIV prevalence in Angola has not had a severe impact on Angola's economic productivity; however, if the spread of HIV continues, it is likely that the epidemic will be particularly devastating to the agricultural, transportation, mining, and education sectors. The fear of HIV/AIDS in Angola is prevalent in all aspects of life, often leading to stigmas surrounding those with HIV/AIDS as well.

International response and help efforts
Similar to many other African countries, much of the help to combat HIV infection and progression to AIDS has come from without the country's own confines.

The United States began giving help to Angola in 2001 with the AIDSMark program established under the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) which was meant to reduce HIV transmission as well as transmission of other sexually transmitted infections and diseases. The program sought to do this primarily through promoting condom use in some of the highly vulnerable populations described above. Since its start, the program also adopted other prevention methods such as counseling, condom distribution, social networking, and prevention of mother to child transmission. This program was put into place to support all 18 provinces in Angola.

Another way in which the United States helps to support Angola in its fight against HIV/AIDS is through the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). Working in conjunction with officials in Angola, PEPFAR provides assistance to maximize the coverage and impact of the national HIV/AIDS response in high risk areas of Angola. PEPFAR also works with the Angolan government to secure investments to make sure that HIV/AIDS prevention is instituted in the necessary social and health service systems within the country. In 2016, PEPFAR helped save the lives of over 20,000 people by providing access to ART and screened over 75,000 for HIV through various testing methods.

Stigma surrounding HIV/AIDS
Due to the large amounts of fear surrounding the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Angola, many individuals who are living with HIV/AIDS are stigmatized greatly by the public. A result from a poll asking if individuals would buy food from someone they knew was HIV positive showed that 51% of people surveyed would not buy the food from that person. Legal efforts made by the government have helped with discrimination against those who are living with HIV/AIDS, but it has not put an end to the issue, a common theme seen across the world. Also, in response to the stigma surrounding this epidemic in the country, many advocacy and awareness campaigns for HIV/AIDS have been started in Angola to help combat the long lasting stigma surrounding this disease.