User:Bullett00/Activation Strain Model/MG4cats Peer Review

General info
Bullett00
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Bullett00/Activation Strain Model
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Conceptual/content edits


 * I found myself wondering, what are the benefits of the activation strain model compared to alternatives? Mentioning any alternative computational tools for studying reaction coordinate diagrams and how their benefits/drawbacks compare to ASM might be valuable :)
 * I think that the sentence "Further, this term is well complimented by group theory and MO theory as a way to describe interaction between orbitals of the correct symmetry" could use either a citation to a review article which explains these concepts in a straightforward way or a bit more explanation to help readers who may not be familiar.
 * I found the "Warning about Single Point Calculations" section rather confusing. I wonder if there's a way to clarify without having to figure out how to add another figure? Maybe that first paragraph could be split into two paragraphs and made more concise.
 * A section on critiques of the ASM (who doesn't use it, and why? What are the major criticisms? What are some cases where the ASM breaks down, or gives inaccurate predictions?) could really round out your article and provide a more holistic picture. :)

Grammar/syntax/sentence structure


 * First sentence of your lead (the hook!) could be more concise, e.g., "The activation strain model (ASM), also referred to as the distortion/interaction model, is a computational tool for understanding chemical reactions. The ASM models potential energy curves along reaction coordinate (ζ) diagrams."
 * I think that the symbol for electrostatic interaction energy in Equation 2, given as ∆Selst, does not match the description given below (∆Velst).
 * I personally would swap out the word "imagined" with something more neutral e.g. "visualized" or "treated as."
 * I would recommend running it through a grammar-checker (e.g., the free version of Grammarly) to catch any remaining typos or awkward sentence construction

'''Overall, I think it's fantastic! Great job :)'''