User:BundlesofRoses013/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Battle of Camlann

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have decided to evaluate this article as arthurian folklore has always been an interest to me.

Evaluate the article
The article does give an adequate introductory sentance that summarizes what the article is about. The content is both up to date and does not have anything missing that is not present in the article. The lead is concise and is not overly-detailed. The article's content is up to date and relevant to the topic, it does not have anything missing or something that should not belong. The article goes into the history of the battle and the statements on some historians of the matter. The article is very neutral and does not have any persuasions in it. The sources in this article are adequate and are kept up to date, the reference links also work in terms of being opened. The article is well written and organized, there are no noticeable grammar or spelling mistakes. There are only 3 images for this article and they do correlate with what the article is saying, it is relevant. The conversations in the talk page are very organized, it as very pleasing to see! The talk page consists of information of the battle, POVs and legends. The articles strengths would have to be how the editors displayed the information given, Arthurian folklore can be hard to find as not many people actually read into the stories. That being said, while the editors worked with what they could find, the information seemed to blur together. The article itself was well organized but the paragraphs tended too wordy. Overall the article is well developed and has a surprising amount of information on the subject!