User:BunnyShampoo/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article:Information privacy
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. It's describes the various privacy issues that is happening

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes it does.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The Lead is short and concise

Lead evaluation
The lead is very short 4 lines and tells a concise overview of the article.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date? No
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? No there are no topics on historically underrepresented populations or topics.

Content evaluation
There are very good contents relating to topic and presents little to no equity gap. However, the content consist of information up to 2008.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes, the article is neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Tone and balance evaluation
There are no indication of opinions or bias claims. All content was informative with no persuasive actions.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current?No
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Sources and references evaluation
The sources goes up to 2008. The links that are included in the article does work properly.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Organization evaluation
Organization is set very well and goes into each topics in sections.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? N/A
 * Are images well-captioned? N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? N/A

Images and media evaluation
There was no images or any visuals in this article.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There are critiques and changes to reduce opinionated tone.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? High importance and apart of 3 wiki projects
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? There are a lot of similarity in the way the article is structured and the recommendations align well with what we discussed in class in terms of content, tone, and citations.

Talk page evaluation
This wiki rated as high importance and it apart of WikiProject Computing, WikiProject Internet, and WikiProject privacy. There are critiques and changes to reduce opinionated tone. Many of the topics has been touched on in our class and training course.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? High importance
 * What are the article's strengths?It is short and very concise, and talks about many different sub topics in the article.
 * How can the article be improved? There could be some added visuals as there was absolutely none in this article.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? The article is developed with good content.

Overall evaluation
It is good and has high importance. The article is very straightforward and concise in its details. I would recommend to add more visuals and expand more on certain topics but it is informative in every sections.