User:Bush 007/African spurred tortoise/Egk006 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Bush 007


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Sandbox page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bush%20007/African_spurred_tortoise?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * African spurred tortoise

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I like how you are providing more information into the taxonomy of the African Spurred Tortoise. The original version of the article doesn't really go into detail on that much, so that's good that you're adding that. I would suggest, however, providing Wikipedia article links to some of the terms you use, such as "Bilateral Subkingdom, the Deuterostomia Infrakingdom, the Chordata Phylum, the Vertebrata Subphylum," because that would allow readers to easily find information on these topics by clicking the link. I believe you can add these by clicking on the link section at the top of the page and then searching for the word, and it should pop up with a specific Wiki article for your words. I would suggest doing this, because many readers (including me) probably don't know what the Deuterostomia Infrakingdom is. Also, consider putting that long sentence of taxonomy into a bulleted list in order for it to be more digestible.

Remember to also cite every piece of information that came from somewhere else. For example, where did you get the information saying that it is the third largest tortoise in the world? I would recommend citing as you go, so that it won't be a ton of work at the end of the project.

You probably already were going to do this, but consider adding a conservation status section, and include a link to the IUCN red list page for the tortoise.