User:Bush 007/African spurred tortoise/Nolss011 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Bush 007


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Bush 007/African spurred tortoise


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * African spurred tortoise

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead focus is good, however, I feel as if it would be best to leave out all taxonomic ranks of the organism in the lead. Viewers can see the rankings to the right of the body when viewing the chart. The Latin translation is a nice piece of information to include in the lead, too. Be sure to leave a source for this information if do choose to change anything about the lead, though.

Overall tone is unbiased and presents information without swaying readers.

Content is appropriate.

No images or graphics were added.

Looking at your sources, they all seem up to date and unbiased. Very good selection. You have a very organized sandbox, too. It was very easy to identify how and what you changed within seconds. Overall a very promising start.