User:Busya97/Ada X/PhrameSeek Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Busya97


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Busya97/Ada X


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * N/A

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall, the article is well written and maintains a neutral tone throughout. Unfortunately, I am not familiar enough with Ada X to make any comments on the contents itself but I would strongly advise looking at your sources and seeing if you could find some sources that discuss some of the work that Ada X does that is not linked directly to their site. From what I can tell, most of the sources are great and the only time you use the website is to contextualize the Festivals and other work they do outside of the studio itself, but I would just be careful in sourcing so much of the information from their website. I know that the existing article I am working on is heavily criticized for deriving most of its information from the artist's website and reads more like a resume because of that. There are some grammatical and sentence structure mistakes as well for examples your final item in a list is never preceded by an "and" which makes the sense feel somewhat unfinished and gives it an abrupt stop. Otherwise I think this is a great beginning to an article! Missing some aesthetic elements like a picture of either their logo or their location but that's just extra that can be added at the end. Great work! :)

Edit: I forgot to mention, watch out for interview sources as well. They are generally considered primary sources so they need to be used with caution.