User:Buzz97/be bold

Article Evaluation
Ledger
 * Everything in the article is relevant to the topic. The article also mentions where the term "ledger" comes from.
 * The article is neutral and does not have a bias towards a point.
 * The link for one of the sources can not be accessed. More reliable citations needs to be added.
 * The sources are not biased, but not each fact is reference with a citation.
 * The article is very short. We should be able to add more to the topic.
 * Editors are mentioning that the differences between ledger and general ledger need to be added. If they are not different, then the entries need to be merged. Also more information needs to be added by someone who has a lot of accounting knowledge.
 * The article has been rated as stub-class and mid-importance.
 * The way Wikipedia discusses this article is not much different than the way we discussed it in class. We all have to have a good reference and citation for the information we add and every point we make needs to be neutral.