User:Bvwrigle/sandbox

I commented in the talk page asking others to revisit citation 4 since when I clicked it, it seemed to be a dead link and when I came back online to look again the link was gone. the citation that is now citation 4 seems like an unreliable source. Overall the information on the page seems accurate but has not enough citations that accurately depict the information that is on the page. the pages that I did go to that were credible seemed to be talking about the application of the mao suit and less about the origins or symbolism in China, but they still have large sections about this on the page. after looking at the talk page of the mao suit Wikipedia page many different people were saying it would be more culturally appropriate to have the document be named Zhongshan suit. I like what you said, Professor Shedden, about adding how the mao suit is used in today's times. I have been studying the book I ordered through interlibrary loan as one of my credible sources, so now what i'm trying to do is maatch up the good information that is on the page with a credible source.

Shedden comments: You've done a decent job commenting on what you have done so far. Now think in terms of what you will do next. What are you going to talk about in terms of origins and symbols or are you going to add more recent applications of the suit??