User:Bwil233/sandbox

Article Evaluation


 * The article is fully relevant to the article topic.


 * Many "citation needed" marks left at the end of many sentences.
 * Lack of acknowledgement to social media, possibly out-dated
 * Gestalt psychology mentioned heavily throughout the article
 * Social Media underrepresented, only mentioned once throughout the whole article
 * Gives many of different representations of visual communication
 * Of the many citations, the one ".gov" link did not work, saying "server error" in file not found
 * Rest of citations showed credible sources supporting the article
 * Only two conversations for the talk page