User:C.Hua Wang/Bias (statistics)/Yibeiiiii Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

C.Hua Wang


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:C.Hua Wang/Bias (statistics)


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Bias (statistics)

Evaluate the drafted change

 * 1) Lead Section (10/15)
 * 2) The added "Lead" sentence has the phrase "what it is estimating" where the "it" lacks clear reference. This phrase can potentially be replaced by "what is being estimated".
 * 3) The added and edited "introduction" section has made the concept easier to understand. However, it will be better if the sentences are not in first-person narrative to make the information sound more objective. Also, there is a minor grammatical error: "For example, to investigate the buying habits of the people." is not a complete sentence.
 * 4) Lacks a context section.
 * 5) Article (15/25)
 * 6) Organization: The new "Types" section does not seem to correspond well with the original "Types" section as the newly added bullet points talk about possible factors while the original bullet points discussed bias type.
 * 7) Content: could include more practical examples in the newly added "Examples" section
 * 8) Balance: good
 * 9) Tone: the introduction section reads a little informal.
 * 10) Images: no images
 * 11) References (13/15)
 * 12) Citations: could include more citations for the many types of biases.
 * 13) Sources: good
 * 14) Completeness: good
 * 15) Existing article (15/20)
 * 16) New sections: the newly added "lead" section in the main text could potentially merge into the actual "Lead" space.
 * 17) Re-organization: good
 * 18) Gaps: fair
 * 19) Smaller additions: fair
 * 20) New article (8/10)
 * 21) Coverage: could potentially include major incidents in history due to the negligence of bias.
 * 22) Article body: good

Total (61/75)