User:C1kschmidt/Forensic toxicology/Safrye8 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

C1kschmidt


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:C1kschmidt/Forensic toxicology


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Forensic toxicology

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead- The lead of this article is very strong and informational. I really like how you discussed the different disciplines that forensic toxicology is divided into. It could be very useful to create subsections for each of these disciplines in the body of the article. This would shorten the lead a bit and could allow for more detail on each of the disciplines.

Content- You added a lot of useful information to this article. In the section under examples, I appreciate how you made the "other" subsection under examples more concise, though I am curious why you took out the example that was written by the previous author. While I agree that section was a little long, I believe it should have been moved to a different section of the article, rather than be completely eliminated. As someone who does not know a lot about forensic toxicology, I found it interesting to read section, and easier to understand in "story" format. Lastly, I would suggest having a different title for the last section entitled "other" to make it more descriptive. Maybe the title could be "Bodily Fluids and Organs" since that is the majority of what you talk about in the paragraph?

Tone and Balance- The tone of this article is neutral and therefore does insinuate bias.

Sources and References- From what I can gather, each of the sources provided in the references section has an active link attached to it and the sources are mainly research articles. The article is well cited throughout the page.

Organization- As I mentioned above, I would suggest a bit of rearranging to make the flow of the article easier to read. Including subsections on the disciplines and renaming some of the categories can make a big difference in the "eye-catching" appeal of the article.

Images and Media- There are not any images of media on this page. Forensic toxicology is very aesthetically pleasing, so it might be useful to include a couple pictures on some of the thing you discuss in the "detection" section. Then again, be careful not to add anything too graphic because that might trigger certain individuals...

Overall Impressions- Overall, great job on adding to this article. Forensic toxicology seems like a fascinating topic, so having deeper information on the Wikipedia page is very useful. I think making the few organizational adjustments listed above will finish out this article well.