User:CBothSides/sandbox

About Me:
I am a first year at Soka University of America

article to revise with group (Me, りさ、りょうへい)

Reuse of Excreta

The Wikipedia article entitled “Reuse of Excreta” is related to SDGs goal 6 because the reuse of excreta can contribute to the sustainable management of water. Reuse of excreta means the use of nutrients contained in human excreta as fertilizer in agriculture and a fuel source. The excreta is collected by the use of the toilet. The method of collecting can be using waterless urinals and urine-diverting dry toilets. Therefore, the reuse of excreta can reduce the demand for water resources and pollution. Moreover, many people will be likely to access toilets, which do not require water.

This article regarding the reuse of excreta matters because it provides people with an inspirational way to deal with the increasing demand for water, which is the primary issue in SDG6. When it comes to saving water, it might be likely that many people feel reluctant to or find it hard to continue to regulate the use of water because they might not find value or noticeable benefit in the practice of saving water at the expense of their privilege to enjoy the water. However, the reuse of excreta can not only contribute to minimizing the demand for water but also improve agricultural production. Because of these benefits, this practice can even motivate people, especially those who are engaged in agriculture, to commit to the betterment of SGD 6.

It is necessary to edit this article because they’re a couple of grammar errors and missing information. Most of the missing information is found in the beginning paragraphs of the article. The Lead doesn’t mention some things that are mentioned later in the article. The history sections lack much information; it would be wise to include more historical facts. Another reason why we need to edit the article is that  some of the sources that some of the information came from old sources. By updating information from new sources. We will be updating the “Economic Considerations” because there is a lack of information.