User:CBrisbois/Eklutna Glacier/FelixMH60 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? CBrisbois
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:CBrisbois/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
Yes, in comparison to the original article - new content has been added in Geology, History, and Research. The first sentence paints the picture of location. The rest of the paragraph highlights the importance of the glacier and a recent study that relates to where it is going, it provides a guide to how the rest of the article is structured. I would expect to see mountain specifics, history of its importance, and research supporting the research.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Content evaluation
In the introduction, geology, and research you discuss climate change and effects to the mountain. Would it be worth considering having a separate paragraph dedicated to that?

Great addition of the history and it being used as a military training ground. Was it also used by the Air Force? You spoke about arctic warfare - could it have been used for search and rescue tactics by the Air Force? Another consideration - regular recreation?

Under research, have there been other types of research done beyond the retreat?

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
Reading the article, yes neutral. Each statement is backed by a specific article. I am more curious about how climate change is effecting the glacier based on its importance. I don't get the sense that I am being persuaded one way or the other.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
Checked few links within the article. They worked. There are some red sections #6 and #9 where it states to "Check Date Values". The links worked. Might be a sandbox issue? Sources are very diverse range that strengthen the article.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
Very easy to read. Nice flow from one section to the next.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
Yes, a picture of the location of Eklutna is great! First question I had was - where is this! It was nice to see the geographical location. In your history section, there are pictures for military training on Eklutna Glacier? Is there a zoomed in map that also shows the location of Whiteout Glacier?

I saw the link about the picture and use. It would be pretty cool to see that side by side. I see the copyright. I looked up wikipedia's image use policy (Image use policy). Under the copyright and licensing. I hope this helps.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
This is a great addition! I know more about Eklutna Glacier now which is awesome. I got to learn about more about the past, present, and future of the mountain as well as the importance. Content added can be improved by adding pictures, expanding to different areas. For example, History - branch to other services, recreational use, etc.