User:CCRivers/sandbox

Final Submission put on the site listed at the very bottom:Since 2013, the ARA has encouraged and helped older American reach and have access to polls and petitions to vote on crucial bills concerning Medicare and Medicad. Bringing the petitions to the doors of those the bills will concern has made it possible for their voices to be heard on issues that affect their day-to-day lives. The ARA has taken a much more hands-on approach in recent years to ensure that the needs of retired Americans will not be ignored but put on the top of the priory list for Congress and those creating and deciding on the laws. ListArticle \, Title= "Alliance for Retired Americans".

Draft: Since 2013 The ARA has encouraged and helped older American reach and have access to polls and petitions to vote on crucial bills concerning medicare and medicad. Bring the petitions to the doors of those the Bills will concern, has made it possible for their voices to be heard on issues that effect their day to day lives. The ARA has taken a much more hands on approach in recent years to insure that the needs of Retired Americans and American who one day will retire will not be ignored, but put on the top of the priory list for congress and those creating and deciding on the laws.

Draft : The ARA page on Wikipedia is missing information on how are current president and presidents for the past several years have addressed and effect the ARA and subjects such as medicare and funding. I want to add in some of the current presidents views on the ARA as they have compared to those of presidents in the past.

Outline the article Alliance for Retired Americans:

Sections: Founding ,Role in medicare, Growth and funding, Decline and name change, Structure, Educational funds. I plan to update the sections, Role in medicare to reflect current stats. I also plan to update growth and funding to show what changes have occurred within the last serval years. I want to add a section of how the ARA is affecting people today and how it will continue to affect people in the next few years.

For my article Alliance for Retired Americans, the changes I want to make are updating the page with current information and improving the accuracy of the information. The sources I will be using include:

www.politifact.com/personalities/alliance-retired-americans/

aftct.org/node/49886

https://retiredamericans.org/alliance-leadership-fiesta/ ' "Article evaluation" Article being evaluated called "Aging". I found most everything in this article to be relevant to the topic and found nothing in the article that distracted me from the topic of aging. After reading the article it appeared to be neutral in it's claims and didn't seem to be heavily biased. I checked several links to citations and all worked for me to bring me to the source of information. The sources appeared to support all the claims from the article and the citations seem to come from reliable sources and journals. Almost all the facts I read were cited from neutral, appearing to be reliable web sites. Most sources were written within the last five -seven years, so they do not appear out of date. This article was given a B rating and is part of Wikiprojsects. Most of the conversation on the "talk" paged appeared to be about the reliability and importance of the article.

"Article proposal"

Talk:Aging in the American workforce : Ways I would improve this article would be to add positives about the aging population in the American workforce, to show that just because you are aging and still working that its not a bad thing. The aging population has much to contribute to the workforce.

Talk:Basic Concepts in Sociology- This article could be improved grammatically, and the author did not site sources which needs to be corrected.

My perfered topic is the "Aging in the American Workforce"