User:CDLR50/Identity (social science)/Awatson723 Peer Review

General info
awatson723
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall, the article provides an interesting exploration of occupational identity and its implications, particularly in relation to stigmatized jobs and identity construction. The author highlights the multifaceted nature of identity and its connection to self-regulation, self-concept, personal control, meaning, and direction. The article also emphasizes the role of occupations in shaping and maintaining identity, as well as the challenges individuals face when their occupations are stigmatized. While the content covered is insightful, there are a few areas that require attention and revision.


 * 1) Citations and References: The article includes several citations, but they are not properly formatted and are not in numerical order. It is important to use a consistent citation style (e.g., APA, MLA) and ensure that the citations are arranged in the correct order within the text. Additionally, a corresponding reference list should be provided at the end of the article, containing complete bibliographic information for each cited source. This will enhance the credibility of the article and allow readers to locate the original references for further exploration.
 * 2) Clarity and Organization: The article would benefit from improved clarity and organization. Some sentences and ideas are not expressed clearly, and the flow of the article can be improved. It is recommended to rephrase and reorganize certain paragraphs to enhance readability and coherence. Additionally, the direct quotes used in the article should be paraphrased or integrated more smoothly into the author's own writing to maintain a consistent tone.
 * 3) Expansion of Concepts: The article briefly mentions the concept of "dirty work" and the challenges faced by individuals in stigmatized jobs. To provide a more comprehensive understanding, it would be helpful to define and elaborate on the concept of "dirty work." Exploring specific examples and discussing the psychological and social implications of stigmatized jobs in greater detail would enhance the article's depth and engagement with the topic.
 * 4) Development of Implications: The article briefly mentions that some individuals prefer not to be defined solely by their occupation and instead seek a balance between all their occupations. However, this concept needs further development and explanation.Exploring the reasons behind this preference and discussing the potential benefits or drawbacks of being defined by multiple occupations would strengthen the article's insights.
 * 5) Conclusion: The article ends abruptly after discussing the need for occupational identity to be an active process involving adaptation and continuity. It would be beneficial to provide a more conclusive ending that summarizes the main points discussed throughout the article and potentially offers suggestions for future research or implications for practice.

In conclusion, the article presents a thought-provoking exploration of occupational identity and its implications. Addressing the issues regarding citations and references, enhancing clarity and organization, expanding on the concept of "dirty work," developing the discussion on multiple occupations, and providing a more conclusive ending will significantly improve the article's quality and overall impact.