User:CDLR50/Identity (social science)/Djward21 Peer Review

General info
CDLR50
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CDLR50/Identity_%28social_science%29?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Identity (social science)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article offers a thorough review of identity, covering a variety of topics including individual identity, social and cultural identity, religious identity, and professional identity. There are a lot of straight quotes in the lead section. It would be more beneficial to rephrase the data in your own words and seamlessly include the main ideas into the narrative. By doing this, readability and flow will be improved while information accuracy is maintained. Some claims and information have faulty citations. It's crucial to make sure that each piece of information is backed up by an appropriate, trustworthy source. The article's credibility would increase if the necessary citations were reviewed and added, enabling readers to confirm information. The section headers and arrangement of the article could use improvement. For instance, the "Implications" part lacks a distinct subheading, while the "Occupational Identity" section melds into the sentence before it. It will be simpler for readers to traverse the content and find specific information if the headings are clear and succinct. While the page seeks to give a general overview of different identities, it's crucial to make sure the information is impartial and unbiased. Make an effort to give a balanced viewpoint and look out for any claims or frames that seem strongly prejudiced. Check the article to make sure no one point of view is disproportionately or underrepresented. To offer thorough knowledge, many perspectives on identity should be thoroughly explored.