User:CEM1020/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Talk:Millions of Cats

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is a start-class article and definitely needs more information about it. It matters because it can be seen as an important piece of literature in regards to children's literature. My preliminary impression was that there was not enough information available and that it is missing key components.

(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
Everything on this page is relevant, however, this page does not focus on the meaning of this pice of literature and the broader context of it and its importance. Nothing on this page had distracted me. The lead in this article does not include the article's major sections. The lead briefly talks about the writer Wanda Gág, but the article itself does not really discuss her except for a sentence or two. So I think more could be said about her as a writer that could help give a better context for this piece of literature. The content of this article is up to date, but there is not much content. More needs to be said about the importance of this book, the writer, illustrator and the historical context in which it was written. The article is in a neutral tone and has good references listed and the work is properly cited, except I was unable to access some of the citations. Also, since more information is needed there also needs to be a greater collection of references to do so. I believe the plot of the article can be a bit confusing and so I think it needs to be cleaned up a bit. There are not many comments on the talk page, the ones that are there are about the illustrations and citations. To go off of this, I think this article could put a greater focus on the imagery within this book as well. This article is part of two categories: children's literature and women writers. My overall impression is that this article needs more information and has specific areas that need improvement.

(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)